Abubakar Zakariyya Al-Hasan1*, Al-Hasan Fatimetu Olohigbe2, & Abubakar Ibrahim Suleiman3 (AUTHORS)
1Department of Urban & Regional Planning, Auchi Polytechnic, Auchi, Nigeria
2Department of Public Administration, Auchi Polytechnic, Auchi, Nigeria
3Department of Agricultural & Bioenvironmental Engineering Technology, Auchi Polytechnic, Auchi, Nigeria
*Corresponding Author’s Email: alhasanaz@gmail.com
ABSTRACT: Nigerian cities are expanding faster than the infrastructure systems that are meant to service them, and two of the most consequential deficits are the progressive erosion of urban green cover and the persistence of an unreliable, fossil-dependent electricity supply. These two deficits are conventionally treated as separate policy problems, handled by separate ministries and financed through separate budget lines. This paper argues that they are structurally coupled and should be planned together. Using a structured desk-based synthesis of peer-reviewed evidence published between 2016 and 2025, together with national policy instruments and energy transition datasets, the study assesses the extent to which green infrastructure and renewable energy systems are currently integrated in Nigerian urban development practice, identifies the mechanisms through which integration produces compound benefits, and diagnoses the institutional barriers that keep the two agendas apart. Evidence from Nigerian and comparable tropical contexts shows that vegetated surfaces measurably reduce ambient and surface temperature, that cooling load is a dominant and rising component of urban electricity demand, and that reductions in cooling demand improve the technical and financial performance of distributed solar systems. The analysis finds that integration in Nigeria remains largely rhetorical: national instruments acknowledge both agendas but assign them to institutions with no shared spatial plan, no shared performance indicators, and no shared budget envelope. The paper proposes an integration framework organised around four coupling points, namely thermal load reduction, stormwater and asset protection, land use co-location, and community-level co-governance, and sets out an implementation pathway that is realistic for the fiscal and administrative capacity of Nigerian states. The contribution is a diagnostic and planning framework rather than a new primary measurement, and the limitations of a synthesis-based design are stated explicitly.
Keywords: Green infrastructure; Renewable energy; Urban planning; Sustainable development; Nigeria; Distributed solar; Urban heat